The origin of divine Christology / Andrew Ter Ern Loke, The University of Hong Kong.

By: Loke, Andrew Ter Ern [author.]
Material type: TextTextSeries: Monograph series (Society for New Testament Studies): Volume 169.Publisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017Description: 1 online resource (268 pages)ISBN: 1108196225; 1108195024; 1108197434; 1108203434; 1108185487; 1108198635Subject(s): Jesus Christ -- Divinity -- History of doctrines -- Early church, ca. 30-600 | Jesus Christ -- Historicity | Jesus Christ -- Person and officesGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: No title; No titleDDC classification: 232/.8 LOC classification: BT216.3 | .L65 2017
Contents:
Introducing the theories and approaches concerning the origin of divine Christology -- The highest Christology was present among the earliest Christians: the evidences -- Replies to objections involving various exalted figures in Second Temple Judaism -- Replies to other objections concerning the highest Christology of the earliest Christians -- The extent of highest Christology in earliest Christianity -- The best explanation for the origin of highest Christology -- Assessing the evidences for the origin of highest Christology in the Gospels -- Conclusion.
Summary: In recent years, there has been considerable debate concerning the origin of divine Christology. Nevertheless, the proposed theories are beset with problems, such as failing to address the evidence of widespread agreement among the earliest Christians concerning divine Christology, and the issues related to whether Jesus' intention was falsified. This book offers a new contribution by addressing these issues using transdisciplinary tools. It proposes that the earliest Christians regarded Jesus as divine because a sizeable group of them perceived that Jesus claimed and showed himself to be divine, and thought that God vindicated this claim by raising Jesus from the dead. It also provides a comprehensive critique of alternative proposals, and synthesizes their strengths. It defends the appropriateness and merits of utilizing philosophical distinctions (e.g. between ontology and function) and Trinitarian concepts for explaining early Christology, and incorporates comparative religion by examining cases of deification in other contexts.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Class number Status Date due Barcode
Books / Monographs Dominican University College Library / Collège Universitaire Dominicain
Hours of operation: Monday - Thursday 8am - 8:30 pm; Friday 8am - 4pm | Les heures d'ouverture : Lundi à jeudi de 8 h à 20 h 30; vendredi 8h - 16h
Standard shelving location / Rayonnage standard
BS 2280 .S62 169 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) Available 120576-1001

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 17 Jul 2017).

Includes bibliographical references (pages 209-231) and indexes

Introducing the theories and approaches concerning the origin of divine Christology -- The highest Christology was present among the earliest Christians: the evidences -- Replies to objections involving various exalted figures in Second Temple Judaism -- Replies to other objections concerning the highest Christology of the earliest Christians -- The extent of highest Christology in earliest Christianity -- The best explanation for the origin of highest Christology -- Assessing the evidences for the origin of highest Christology in the Gospels -- Conclusion.

In recent years, there has been considerable debate concerning the origin of divine Christology. Nevertheless, the proposed theories are beset with problems, such as failing to address the evidence of widespread agreement among the earliest Christians concerning divine Christology, and the issues related to whether Jesus' intention was falsified. This book offers a new contribution by addressing these issues using transdisciplinary tools. It proposes that the earliest Christians regarded Jesus as divine because a sizeable group of them perceived that Jesus claimed and showed himself to be divine, and thought that God vindicated this claim by raising Jesus from the dead. It also provides a comprehensive critique of alternative proposals, and synthesizes their strengths. It defends the appropriateness and merits of utilizing philosophical distinctions (e.g. between ontology and function) and Trinitarian concepts for explaining early Christology, and incorporates comparative religion by examining cases of deification in other contexts.

Description based on print version record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha